Independent Media TV
     








__________________________________________________________

Sections

Under Reported
Environment
Science
Independent Artist
Philosophy
__________________________________________________________

Columnists

Jason Leopold
Todd Smyth
Beldeu Singh
Andrew Limburg
Evelyn Pringle
Readers Write
__________________________________________________________

Highlighted Topics

Promoted Materials

Register To Vote

Election 2004

E-Voting Machines / Vote Integrity

Breaking International Law

2003 Top 30 Under Reported Stories

Top Stories Ignored By U.S. Media

Media Lies and Right Wing Bias

Media Censorship and Control

Bush Environmental Impact

World Trade / Globalization

Bush Administration Lies and Deceit

Dick Cheney and Halliburton

Project for a New American Century

Fox News, 24hr Republican Network

The Bush Crime Family

Israeli Palestinian Middle East Conflict

__________________________________________________________

Video Archive

Audio Archive
__________________________________________________________

Under Reported

Just Say No to Bush's Drugs

October 02, 2004

By: Melissa Carr

Independent Media TV

Printer Friendly Version



Material by:
Melissa Carr

Material from:
Independent Media TV

Material about:
Top Stories Ignored By U.S. Media

Material about:
Health

Material about:
Bush Administration Lies and Deceit

Material about:
Big Brother and Personal Privacy

A little-known initiative by President Bush is quietly creeping through the United States. The proposal is based on recommendations from the New Freedom Commission on Mental Health. It is part of the broader New Freedom Initiative for the disabled. The Commission convened in April 2002 and released its report with recommendations on July 2003. Although this proposal has been largely overlooked by the mass media, it plans to impact every American citizen in a very frightening way.

The report points to the Texas Medication Algorithm Project (TMAP) as a model on which to base the national mental health agenda. TMAP was a pilot program under then-Governor Bush that standardized certain medications for certain mental illnesses in a flow chart fashion. The report also recommends that every citizen in the United States should be screened for mental illness, including children. It states, ?Each year, young children are expelled from preschool and childcare facilities for severely disruptive behaviors and emotional disorders.? It then suggests early detection is paramount in mental health and ?schools can help address mental health problems.? Beyond the classroom, the report suggests screenings should be addressed in primary care ?throughout the lifespan.?

So, the commission has determined that everyone should be tested for mental illness and a flow chart determines which medication should be used to treat it. Sound alarming? It should, especially upon hearing what Allen Jones has to say about it. Mr. Jones was employed as an investigator in Pennsylvania?s Office of Inspector General. He was investigating corrupt activities involving pharmaceutical companies offering honorariums to state officials. The OIG manager told him, ?Drug companies write checks to politicians?they write checks to politicians on both sides of the aisle,? and changed his assignment.

Jones decided to continue his investigation on his own time. And he discovered that TMAP, which Pennsylvania adopted in 2002 under then-Governor Tom Ridge, was in fact driven by pharmaceutical companies who were lavishing Texas politicians, as well as making sure their most expensive patented drugs (some with potentially lethal side effects) were listed as the designated treatments on the algorithms. Jones released a 66-page whistleblower report about the scandal in January 2004 and was subsequently fired by the OIG.

Included in his report is background information on each member of the New Freedom Commission on Mental Health, offering valuable insight on this group of individuals who decided all citizens should be screened and possibly medicated for mental illness. Among them you will find Michael Hogan, whose research institute relies heavily on pharmaceutical company grants. Another is Norwood Knight-Richardson, a Texas college buddy of Bush Sr. whom he appointed as then-Governor to the Texas drug and alcohol council during the establishment of TMAP. Knight-Richardson is also the director of a pharmaceutical delivery company that has significantly profited from contracts in post-war Iraq.

The Bush family has direct pharmaceutical connections as well. According to the British Medical Journal, Bush Sr. was a board member at Eli Lilly Pharmaceuticals, and Bush Jr. appointed Lilly?s CEO, Sidney Taurel, as a member of Homeland Security Council.

One might have been able to write off Allen Jones? stunning report as a conspiracy theory, if it weren?t for the lawsuits of Dr. David Franklin and Dr. Stefan Kruszewski. Franklin, a former Warner-Lambert (now part of Pfizer) employee, was ?paid to lie to doctors? about prescribing the drug Neurontin in cases where it was neither clinically safe nor effective. Pfizer pleaded guilty to criminal fraud and agreed to pay $430 million in fines. That amount pales in comparison to the $2.9 billion in annual Neurontin sales.

Dr. Kruszewski was hired as a psychiatric consultant for the Pennsylvania Department of Health and Human Services. In his current federal lawsuit, he alleges he was fired after he uncovered corrupt relations between Pennsylvania politicians and pharmaceutical representatives. Allegations of fraudulent medication billings to the United States government were also voiced. Even more disturbing, however, is his allegation that four children and one adult died while under the state?s care, and all were prescribed lethal combinations of anti-psychotic drugs. He was denied access to the autopsy records and later fired.

Illinois has been the first state to adopt the New Freedom Commission?s proposal. All children ages 0-18 and pregnant women must undergo mandatory mental health screenings. Iowa is moving towards adopting the proposal. On September 15, Congress voted 95-315 against a bill to cut federal funding for school mental health screenings.

The implications are astounding. Politicians are bedding with pharmaceutical companies at the detriment of the American people. But even more alarming is the concept of forced screenings and the desire to drug our children. If there are that many children suffering from mental illness, we need to examine our society to find out why. Prevention is the answer?NOT doping up young children with mind-altering psychotropic medications!

If this initiative proliferates, how long before parents of diagnosed children will be charged with negligence if they choose not to medicate their children? The New Freedom Initiative is another anti-freedom policy spawned by Bush that reeks of corruption and malicious intent, but is disguised a goodwill gesture towards the disabled. As with the Patriot Act, Bush applied a buzzword, freedom, and assumed it would enjoy support from the ignorant masses. It is now the responsibility of every American citizen to stand up and just say no to Bush?s drugs.

References: http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/328/7454/1458
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=39078
http://www.illinoisleader.com/news/newsview.asp?c=17748
http://www.dhs.state.ia.us/Publications/Block%20Grant%2008-29-03%20FINAL.doc
http://psychrights.org/Drugs/AllenJonesTMAPJanuary20.pdf
http://www.namiscc.org/News/2004/Spring/PfizerGuilty.htm
http://www.ahrp.org/infomail/04/07/07.html
http://www.teenscreen.org/newsroom/downloads/Annualreport3.pdf - Page 5. Legislation for the proposal has already been introduced in Pennsylvania, Georgia, and Nevada, with governors in Iowa and Florida also supporting the screenings.


Original Link: http://www.independent-media.tv/


© Copyright 2004 Independent Media TV                           Printer Friendly Version




The views represented here are not necessarily the views of Independent Media TV.

FAIR USE NOTICE - ALL information on this website is for educational purposes ONLY.

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.