See more The City Paper
Sunday, June 15, 2003 Please Login     Contact Us     *Archives     Advertise    Home     
SEARCH OUR SITE
Go!

Interactive
Crossword
Traffic cams
Real Estate
Designer Corner
TV Listings
Movie listings
PDF Format

Click on the graphic to read today's City Paper in PDF as it appears in print.

Contests
Enter now
City Scope
Recognize it? Be the first one and win!
Details »
I Do
I DoA weekly look into local engaged couples and the wide world of wedded bliss.
Read on »
Archives
View Archives
Week in review
Today's news
Subscribe
Please Login
Site Services
Modify Account
Advertise
Contact Us
Link to us
Invite a friend

2 opinion(s) posted
SEND TO FRIEND  | POST OPINION  
Tennesseans file Paxil suit
By Amanda Wardle, awardle@nashvillecitypaper.com
June 04, 2003
 
Nearly 40 Tennesseans have filed suit against pharmaceutical giant GlaxoSmithKline, charging the company did not properly inform patients of potential addictive side effects of the antidepressant drug Paxil.

The suit, filed recently in Middle Tennessee’s U.S. District Court, asks Federal District Court Judge Todd Campbell to award damages of at least $1 million per plaintiff to individuals who say they suffered adverse physical and psychological effects akin to withdrawal symptoms when they stopped using Paxil, but had not been previously warned by the makers of the drug that such effects were possible.

Legal documents state that GlaxoSmithKline knowingly marketed Paxil in the United States as a drug with “mild” side effects when they actually knew that side effects could be severe. In addition, the suit claims that the company intentionally labeled what plaintiffs say can be acute withdrawal symptoms as “discontinuation” symptoms, in order to downplay the effects of the drug.

The suit is one of several federal lawsuits that have been filed since August 2001 in numerous states across the country against GlaxoSmithKline charging that the European company, which also markets such drugs as Advair, Imitrex, Valtrex, Tums and Nicoderm CQ, did not include in its list of potential side effects the possibility that patients could suffer withdrawal symptoms such as nausea, anxiety, dizziness, agitation, tremor, palpitations and sleep disturbances after discontinuing the drug.

Karen Barth, one of the lead members of counsel in this and other suits across the country regarding Paxil withdrawal, said nearly 10,000 people from across the nation have contacted her Los Angeles law firm reporting Paxil withdrawal problems since the first suit was filed more than a year and a half ago.

Paxil, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) of the same class as Zoloft and Prozac, was introduced as a prescription antidepressant medication in late 2002. This most recent suit claims that medical experts in the United States and Great Britain have reported the potential withdrawal side effects of the drug since nearly the month it hit the market. Some experts have reported that adverse withdrawal symptoms to Paxil were reported in 30 percent to 40 percent of subjects tested, and were markedly worse than withdrawal symptoms reported for Prozac or Zoloft by as much as 4-to-1.

The suit claims that the fact that Paxil was not administered with any warning of potential withdrawal connotes false and misleading advertising as well as irresponsible marketing of a product on the part of GlaxoSmithKline, who, attorneys say, did not even perform any internal, ongoing studies into the potentially addictive side effects of the drug.

GlaxoSmithKline has publicly denied charges that Paxil may be addictive since the filing of the first charges in 2001. Company representatives did not return phone calls Tuesday by press time.

The company’s Web site acknowledges possible side effects that Paxil users might experience while taking the drug, characterizing them as “mild to moderate,” which include constipation, decreased appetite, insomnia, nervousness and others.

GlaxoSmithKline reported multi-billion dollar sales and net profits for 2002.
 
Area sports:
 Minor League Baseball
 Nashville 3, New Orleans 0
 More scores»
 Weekly schedule»
 
News
  • Rolling on the river
  • Nashville hosts national network
  • Olympic Plaza to honor athletes
  • Edwards stumps in Nashville
  • Harding permit on table
  • HCA linen service suit against DRL delayed
  • Panel defers Antioch plan
  • First ‘Old Glory’ once proudly flew in Nashville
  • West End Summit in works
  • News briefs
  • Death Notices
  • Business
  • ACG firm raising $280M
  • Hospital nixes appeal on ruling
  • A buzz with affordable housing
  • Business Calendar
  • Business briefs
  • Executive Appointments
  • Legal listings
  • Lifestyle
  • The Dead keep on truckin’
  • Second hand Swan
  • Blues guitarist overcomes real-life heartaches
  • Weekend concert spotlights city’s rich jazz, blues heritage
  • Jam band still calming Widespread Panic
  • Flaming Lips keeping fans up late at Bonnaroo
  • Jack Johnson still making waves
  • Galactic funks up Bonnaroo
  • City Confidential
  • Can't stick label on 'Hollywood Homicide'
  • Carr drives play at Ryman
  • O.A.R. plans to rock jam band fest
  • Gimme Moe. please
  • Spearhead makes message in their music
  • Barber on cusp of jazz stardom
  • New compilations spotlight favorite
  • The Trachtenburg Players: A family affair
  • How to vacation inexpensively in the British Isles
  • Bonnaroo brings fields full of fans to Manchester in search of music
  • Sports
  • Nashville’s French boast
  • Belmont signs Byrd to extension
  • Vandy may host NWFA title game
  • Metros seeing red after 1-0 loss to Memphis
  • Hahn eyes All-American status
  • Vanderbilt's Ransom undecided about pro ball
  • Chasing women Eakin’s Dream job
  • Adams, Gaylord continue AFL discussions
  • Fairgrounds drivers want NASCAR
  • TSU assistant leaves for Columbia
  • West End’s dead end
  • Sounds' quintet whitewashes Zephyrs, 3-0
  • Nashville rugby rumbles on national scene
  • Editorials
  • Fan Fair name change to show city’s diversity
  • Letters To The Editor
  • Commentary
  • Don't let Congress burn nation’s First Amendment
  • Do we really want food Nazis to rein in U.S.?
  • Dwellings and Décor
  • Possibilities endless for children's décor
  • Rubberized molding offers custom trim alternative
  • 18th century English always in style
  • Luxurious home has comfort, offers flexibility in its rooms
  • Kitchen alcove features new multi-use area concept
  • Start right, then keep it clean
  • City Kids
  • The history of Father’s Day
  • Is your dad ‘tie’red of the same old gift?

  • Home  I  News  I  Business  I  Sports  I  Lifestyle  I  Editorials  I  Commentary
    Copyright 2003 The City Paper,LLC
    Read our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service