By Shankar Vedantam
Washington Post Staff
Writer
Wednesday, September 15, 2004; Page A02
Families and doctors should be cautioned that children taking antidepressant
drugs may be at an increased risk for suicidal behavior and thinking, and the
government should require a prominent "black box" warning label on the
medications, an expert panel concluded yesterday. If adopted, the recommendation by the panel advising the Food and Drug
Administration would mark a significant shift in the government's regulatory
stance toward the widely used drugs -- which include Prozac, Paxil, Zoloft and
Celexa -- for treating children with depression, anxiety, obsessive-compulsive
disorder or other conditions. Such a warning would raise the stakes for physicians deciding whether to
prescribe the drugs and would encourage parents and doctors to pay much closer
attention to research that has raised questions about whether the drugs are safe
and effective for children, experts said. Expressing the dilemma faced by the expert panel, chairman Wayne Goodman, a
psychiatrist at the University of Florida in Gainesville, said he wanted to
discourage casual use of the drugs while preserving doctors' ability to
carefully assess children and prescribe the medications when needed. "We can't ignore there is data out there that points to the effectiveness and
protective action of these drugs against suicide," Goodman said. "Given what we
know, I am not ready to ban the antidepressants." Several psychiatrists told the panel during two days of hearings that the
failure of many studies to show that the drugs worked does not mean they are
ineffective. Many families testified that the medications helped their
children. But panel member Thomas Newman, a professor of epidemiology at the University
of California at San Francisco, said, "We have very strong evidence of harm and
not very strong evidence of efficacy. It would not be bad if use of these drugs
were diminished." The panel's recommendation comes as use of the medications has soared despite
growing evidence of their risks. Many panel members blamed pharmaceutical
industry marketing for prompting clinicians to prescribe the drugs. Short of an outright ban, a "black box" warning is the most serious caution
the FDA can require. Several panel members said they hope it would discourage
drug companies from advertising antidepressants to patients, especially through
television. The warning would not preclude such marketing, experts said, but the
requirement that the caution be included in any ads could make them unappealing
or unfeasible. The rulings came at the end of two days of high drama in Bethesda, where
experts were told about a new FDA analysis of 24 antidepressant trials that
showed that children taking a range of drugs had twice the rate of suicidal
behavior and thinking compared with those who took dummy pills, or placebos. The panel had to wrestle with a problem unique to psychiatry: Depression is
itself associated with suicide, and many specialists believe the drugs reduce
the risk. While there is no conclusive evidence of this, studies have shown that
suicide rates dropped among populations of children as the prescribing of
antidepressants increased. Some experts believe the medications, many of which
belong to a class of drugs called selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, or
SSRIs, may increase the risk of suicide among some children while reducing it in
others. "If there were no SSRIs, would there be more suicides, fewer suicides or the
same number of suicides in children?" panel member Norman Fost, professor of
pediatrics and bioethics at the University of Wisconsin Medical School, asked at
the start of yesterday's session. Robert J. Temple, the FDA's associate director for medical policy, said there
are no data to answer that question. But most of the panelists agreed that the enthusiasm for the drugs among
American physicians was not supported by the research. Many noted with concern
that with the exception of Prozac, none of the antidepressants have been
approved by the FDA for treating depression in children. Most children are
prescribed the medications "off label" -- based on physicians' belief that the
drugs are safe and effective. Once a drug has been cleared for the market,
physicians are free to use it even for conditions not specifically endorsed by
the agency. The panel's recommendation, on a 15 to 8 vote, left the FDA in the
potentially awkward position of having to warn physicians about using the drugs
for purposes that the agency has not approved. While the agency traditionally avoids telling doctors how to practice
medicine, many panel members argued that drug marketing was superseding science:
Although companies cannot promote most of the antidepressants for childhood
depression -- an unapproved use -- they can aggressively market the same
medications for adults. The experts noted that although Prozac is the only drug specifically approved
to treat depression in children, the top-selling antidepressant for youngsters
is Zoloft. Two trials of Zoloft failed to show the medication was superior to
sugar pills in depressed children. Prozac is no longer being actively marketed because its patent has expired;
Zoloft is still being promoted. Temple said the FDA would weigh whether to include specific information on
each drug's label detailing how the drug had performed in clinical trials.