Health
TeenScreen's
top promoter: Laurie Flynn
By Evelyn Pringle Online Journal Contributing Writer
Download a .Pdf File for
Printing. Adobe Acrobat Reader Required. Click Here to
Download a Free Copy.
June
7, 2005—On January 1, 2001, Laurie Flynn joined the Columbia
University Department of Psychiatry, and became the top dog
for marketing the TeenScreen program which is nothing but a
clever tool invented to recruit children in public schools as
customers for the pharmaceutical companies.
The
truth about programs like TeenScreen and the pills Flynn is
pushing were uncovered during an investigation by the US
Preventive Services Task Force. A report by the Task Force
released in May of 2004, determined:
(A) There is no evidence that screening for suicide
risk reduces suicide attempts or
mortality.
(B) There is limited evidence on the accuracy of
screening tools to identify suicide risk.
(C) There is insufficient evidence that treatment of
those at high risk reduces suicide attempts or
mortality.
(D) No studies were found that directly address the
harms of screening and treatment for suicide
risk.
Prior to joining Columbia, Flynn served as the
executive director of National Alliance for the Mentally Ill
(NAMI) for 16 years. NAMI bills itself as "a grassroots
organization of individuals with brain disorders and their
family members."
In
reality, NAMI is the pharmaceutical industry's number one
front group dedicated solely to promoting and selling as many
pills as humanly possible. Which means before she hooked up
with TeenScreen, Flynn was the nation's top pill pusher for 16
years.
The
pharmaceutical industry has long funneled money to groups like
NAMI which become conduits for spreading industry-friendly
information and funding marketing schemes.
Let
there be no doubt about who paid Flynn's salary at NAMI for 16
years. According to internal NAMI documents obtained by Mother
Jones Magazine, between 1996 and mid-1999, 18 drug firms gave
NAMI a total of $11.72 million. The companies include Janssen
($2.08 million), Novartis ($1.87 million), Pfizer ($1.3
million), Abbott Laboratories ($1.24 million), Wyeth-Ayerst
($658,000), and Bristol-Myers Squibb ($613,505).
NAMI's top donor was Eli Lilly. The company gave $2.87
million during that period. In 1999 alone, Lilly delivered
$1.1 million in quarterly installments, with most of it going
to help fund NAMI's "Campaign to End Discrimination" against
the mentally ill.
Let
me explain the meaning of "Campaign to End Discrimination."
This was a marketing scheme aimed at finding a way to force
more insurance companies and government health care programs
to quit "discriminating" against pharma's mentally ill
customers and pay for all the pills they want to sell to the
steady stream of customers they plan to recruit with mass
mental health screening projects like TeenScreen.
According to Dr Peter Breggin, psychiatrist and
founder of The International Center for the Study of
Psychiatry and Psychology (ICSPP), "These groups hold national
meetings that bring together drug advocates to talk directly
to consumers. They also put out newsletters and other
information that praise medications. Sometimes they actively
suppress viewpoints that are critical of drugs—for example, by
discouraging the media from airing opposing
viewpoints."
On
March 2, 2004, Flynn took her TeenScreen marketing scam to
Congress and testified at the hearing, Suicide Prevention and
Youth: Saving Lives. She said: "In 2003, we were able to
screen approximately 14,200 teens at these sites; among those
students, we were able to identify approximately 3,500 youth
with mental health problems and link them with treatment. This
year, we believe we will be able to identify close to 10,000
teens in need, a 300 percent increase over last
year."
Most
screening programs take place in schools, Flynn said, but the
program can also be implemented in residential treatment
facilities, foster care settings, clinics, shelters, drop-in
centers and other settings that serve youth.
Flynn said TeenScreen's goal is "to ensure that every
teenager receives a mental health check-up before leaving high
school."
That's right, she has a goal to get 'em hooked before
they ever leave school.
TeenScreen's promotional materials claim the project
is not funded by the government or drug companies. Well then
somebody better arrest Flynn for lying under oath when she
testified about how her fellow pill-pushing buddy, Mike Hogan,
got five counties in Ohio to cough up $15,000 a piece to set
up TeemScreen.
In
Ohio, Flynn told members of Congress: "We have been fortunate
to work with Mike Hogan, PhD, director of the Ohio Department
of Mental Health, chair of the President's New Freedom Mental
Health Commission, and a member of our National Advisory
Council. In February 2002, Commissioner Hogan initiated a
statewide TeenScreen effort by soliciting five county mental
health boards to be part of a pilot program. Over the next 10
to 18 months, the development of these screening sites was
supported by staff at the TeenScreen Program as well as
through a grant of $15,000 from the Department of Mental
Health to each mental health board who is participating in the
pilot program (Cuyahoga County, Clermont County, Butler
County, Stark County, and Wayne/Holmes Counties)."
Now
why would I ever infer that Hogan is a pusher? Well for
starters, on May 23, PRNewswire announced that a documentary
titled, Out of the Shadow, which illuminates the
national plight of schizophrenia is going to be screened at a
meeting of 1,000 professionals. The press release said that
the film would be introduced by Dr. Michael Hogan, and that
the screening was supported by Janssen Pharmaceutica, a
company that currently markets the same medications that Hogan
and TeenScreen are pushing.
The
flood of tax dollar being funneled into TeenScreen is not
limited to Ohio. According to an investigation conducted by
records researcher Ken Kramer, the Florida Office of Drug
Control provided a $45,000 grant to Flagler Palm Coast High
School that went for TeenScreen, where the survey was used in
ninth grade health class.
And
according to Kramer's investigation, the Office of Drug
Control provided another $45,000 grant to a drug treatment
center that went for TeenScreen.
Additionally, on November 17, 2004, officials at the
University of South Florida announced receiving $98,641 in
funding from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services
Administration (SAMHSA) for the Florida Suicide Prevention
Pilot Project to expand the TeenScreen Program efforts in the
Tampa Bay area.
Flynn told Congress, "The need for increased
availability of youth mental health screening is evidenced by
the fact that close to 750,000 teens are depressed at any one
time, and an estimated 7–12 million youth suffer from mental
illness. While treatments are available for these severely
disabling disorders, sadly, most children do not receive the
treatment they need." Translation: "treatment" means
pills.
Flynn's testimony is evidence that pharma believes it
can recruit 7–12 million school kids with this profiteering
scheme. Do the math and figure out how much they will make
once TeenScreen has this group of consumers running to the
drug store each and every month.
Phyllis Schlafly, the author of "No Child Left
Unmedicated," says the marketing scheme is working. "Columbia
University pilot project for screening students, called
TeenScreen, resulted in one-third of the subjects being
flagged as 'positive' for mental health problems. Half of
those were turned over for mental health treatment. If that is
a preview of what would happen when 52 million public school
students are screened, it would mean hanging a libelous label
on 17 million American children and forcibly putting 8 million
children into the hands of the psychiatric/pharmaceutical
industry."
These days one of Flynn's main duties is to keep track
of teen suicides all over the country and then write letters
to the editors of local newspapers to take advantage of
vulnerable communities in mourning by faking compassion to get
her TeenScreen marketing scheme into local public
schools.
Here
is Flynn hawking her wares in the Sacramento Bee on March 28,
2003, in response to an article about a teen suicide,
describing how she wants to screen every teen in the country,
claiming TeenScreen could "save a young person's
life":
"Columbia University recently launched a national
initiative to screen every teen in America for depression and
suicide risk. Through its TeenScreen program, Columbia
provides communities with free consultation, training,
technical assistance, and screening and assessment tools.
TeenScreen has been developed, implemented and evaluated over
the past decade, and is one of the most effective systems
available for identifying youth at risk for depression and
suicide risk.
"This method of detection could save a young person's
life," Flynn wrote.
Here
she is on May 14, 2003, in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette,
throwing around bogus statistics that she obviously pulls out
of her hat: "Almost one in 10 American teenagers suffers from
a mental illness, and the failure to detect and treat it can
have deadly consequences. Ninety percent of youth who commit
suicide, the third-leading cause of death among teenagers,
have depression or another diagnosable and treatable mental
illness at the time of death. Research has shown that the
majority of those identified as suffering from depression or
suicide risk are not known by parents, school personnel or
other adults to have a significant problem.
"No
family is immune from the potential horror of suicide. I
strongly encourage parents, health professionals, educators
and others to support our initiative for the routine screening
of teens to help prevent the terrible tragedy of
suicide."
Here
Flynn is in on June 16, 2003, the St Louis Post-Dispatch
peddling TeenScreen with the we want to save your kids "for
free" line. "TeenScreen provides communities with the
tools and training necessary to identify youth at risk for
suicide and/or suffering from unidentified and untreated
mental illness. Columbia provides communities with
consultation, training, technical assistance, and screening
and assessment tools free of charge."
Flynn did Dallas on October 31, 2004, in the Dallas
Morning News and played on the guilt factor by claiming teens
kill themselves due to a failure (by their parents I assume),
to detect and treat their mental illness. "Almost one in 10
American teenagers suffers from a mental illness, and the
failure to detect and treat it can have deadly consequences.
Research has shown that 90 percent of those who commit suicide
suffered from a diagnosable and treatable mental
illness."
On
December 9, 2004, she cranked up the guilt factor in the
Boston Herald by claiming the suicide could have been
prevented. "Young people cutting their own lives short is
always shocking, but, unfortunately, it occurs more often than
people think. Suicide is the third leading cause of death
among teens today, but few are aware how many teen suicides
could have been prevented through programs that screen for
adolescent depression and suicide risk."
Flynn bragged to Congress about her associations with
government officials in Florida and said, "TeenScreen Program
staff has been working with Governor Jeb Bush to help achieve
his goal of reducing suicides in the state. We have
specifically collaborated with Jim McDonough, director of the
Office of Drug Control, and the state Suicide Prevention Talk
Force. In partnership with the University of South Florida we
are piloting district wide mental health screening of 9th
graders in Hillsborough and Pinellas counties."
To
her credit, Flynn does come across as very professional and
caring in her letters to the editors and while testifying
before congress.
However, this is how she really talks with her fellow
marketing buddies. In an email obtained by Ken Kramer to Jim
McDonough, director of the Florida Office of Drug Control,
from Flynn, she wrote:
"I'm
looking for a horse to ride in here! . . . I need to get some
kids screened—if the schools are a road block we are
interested in community organizations. Next week we are
talking with the Boys and Girls Club in Pinellas. . . . I also
think we should see if local agencies or businesses could be
engaged in 'community screenings.'"
In
my book, trying to capitalize off the pain and guilt of
parents and communities who have just suffered the loss of
child to suicide makes Flynn a despicable human being. I
propose that local school boards tell her to take her
TeenScreen survey and ride out of town on the same horse she
rode in on.
Evelyn Pringle is a columnist for Independent Media
TV and an investigative journalist focused on exposing
corruption. |